Moonrise kingdom, ese original retrato del motivo de una pareja que huye de la civilización para desarrollar su relación, que deviene absurdo ante todo debido a la edad de los amantes, fue la encargada de abrir el Festival de Cannes de 2012 y se ha estrenado hace apenas unos meses en cartelera. Y Wes Anderson ya está preparando su próximo proyecto, pues su original toque, en las fronteras de lo absurdo y lo fantástico, ha encontrado una amplia difusión entre la audiencia. Parece ser el tiempo de Wes Anderson, quien logra captar algunas de las inconsistencias de la vida norteamericana actual a través de su estilo. Ahora está sumergido en The Grand Budapest Hotel, y hoy se ha confirmado una nueva incorporación al reparto: Jude Law.
Jude Law siempre se ha confesado fan del cine de Wes Anderson, y en The Grand Budapest Hotel va a ser un personaje secundario, de breve aparición, pero clave para la historia. Esto lo ha confirmado el propio actor británico en el Festival Internacional de Toronto, donde está presentando la nueva obra en la que participa, Anna Karenina, protagonizada por Keira Knightley y dirigida por Joe Wright. Y ha afirmado lo siguiente:
He sido un gran fan de Wes. Lo acosé con emails, diciendo: "Quiero vivir en una de tus películas y me gustaría estar en una de tus películas"
Pero no es el único nombre confirmado para el metraje: en julio se publicó la noticia de que será protagonizada por Johnny Depp. Y también participará Angela Lansbury, a quien todos asociamos con la entrañable escritora de novelas negras, que era capaz de resolver todos los casos con su intuición innata en Murder, she wrote (Se ha escrito un crimen). Wes Anderson y Angela Lansbury es una buena combinación, pues el personaje al que asociamos su figura tiene algo de fantástico y de ideal. Otros nombres que también forman parte del reparto son: Owen Wilson, Bill Murray, Edward Norton, Jeff Goldblum, Adrien Brody y Willem Dafoe. En fin, un casting impresionante para una obra que comenzará a rodarse en Enero de 2013.
Fotos: Dauntless Jaunter
Exactly what web-sites in addition to websites perform the diving community connect many for?
Hey mate, hows it going? you like football mnaager games right? i found this cool one online footy-manager com its very similar to the football mnaager game. check it out. its pretty cool actually.
Whoa there Anon! First off, I hope your spleen is back where it benogls- that had to hurt. ;-) You spilled a lot of ink and incurred a lot of Opportunity Cost in response to a very short, very top-level analysis.First off, recognize I’m talking System Analysis, Ops Research and Game Theory. You are talking Econ 101 & 102. We are viewing the same landscape but describing different things while speaking different languages. It also doesn't help, as you recognized in your comment, that there is indeed a fairly high level of abstraction to the concepts (health care, transparency, etc) we are discussing at this time. Second: I never confuse "price" and "cost". “Price” is what one pays for a "Cost". Third: Methinks “Cost Control” are trigger words for your ears. Re: What do you mean by control of costs? Towards what purpose? Whose control? “Control” should not be interpreted as some single entity with their hand on the switch – and it surely doesn’t mean 99% of what any Legislator or 99.9% of any Legislative Committee could come up with on their own. In fact, about the only thing they could do that was positive is remove or weaken some laws and regulation – but they’d probably screw that up too.Actors within the health care system, by negotiated and/or iterated design, exert pressure (including possibly changing the system design and adding or removing actors within the system) on the system through either new or changed behaviors or technical/material innovation(s) that alter the performance of the system, to meet one or more desired objectives. In this case the desired objectives are to ensure the sustainability of an effective health care system while attenuating/eliminating the growth in the resources involved in the operation of the health care system for the benefit of the actors within the system. Responsibility is shared (this is where legislation usually screws things up) among all the actors in the system. Ultimately, one might say the designers and actors are the ‘controllers’. Within an ideal closed system, I believe the designers and actors would be the same. Increased transparency (knowledge about) of the health care system design and associated costs can only allow the actors within that system to identify system design weaknesses and strengths, and then motivate them to act on that knowledge and improve the system.My apologies to our host for eating up her bandwidth.